Comment 17 for bug 1622227

Well, as I said, my vote would be for 40x40.

I don't want to put words into your mouth, but maybe you see it like: Use the smallest size where you as a developer still feel motivated to provide a *nice* user experience.

Whereas my point of view would be: Use the smallest size, below which users would risk running into really weird errors and they might start bugging developers with useless bugreports, like: "I made the window 1x1 and now I can't make it large again."

It's not like the user would be forced to use the smallest size. The smallest size should just be a kind of safety net, but if a user would want to choose to sacrifice some *nicety* for a particular usecase (whateverthatmightbe), why not let them.