On 7 May 2012 13:46, Anders Logg <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:33:45PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
>> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:08:05PM -0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> > OK - but even if it is all public domain, it would be helpfule to have a
>> > COPYING or LICENSE file clearly stating this (and the authors,
>> > perhaps).
>>
>> Yes, definitely. We will add one (or both).
>>
>> There just seems to be some confusion as to what the licensing terms
>> should actually be.
>
> We're just waiting for OK from Martin.
>
> Martin, are you ok with your changes to
>
> ./src/utils/python/ufc_utils/build.py
>
> being put in the public domain?
>
> --
> Anders
On 7 May 2012 13:46, Anders Logg <email address hidden> wrote: python/ ufc_utils/ build.py
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:33:45PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
>> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:08:05PM -0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> > OK - but even if it is all public domain, it would be helpfule to have a
>> > COPYING or LICENSE file clearly stating this (and the authors,
>> > perhaps).
>>
>> Yes, definitely. We will add one (or both).
>>
>> There just seems to be some confusion as to what the licensing terms
>> should actually be.
>
> We're just waiting for OK from Martin.
>
> Martin, are you ok with your changes to
>
> ./src/utils/
>
> being put in the public domain?
>
> --
> Anders
I'm ok with that.
Martin