On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:33:45PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:08:05PM -0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> > OK - but even if it is all public domain, it would be helpfule to have a
> > COPYING or LICENSE file clearly stating this (and the authors,
> > perhaps).
>
> Yes, definitely. We will add one (or both).
>
> There just seems to be some confusion as to what the licensing terms
> should actually be.
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:33:45PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:08:05PM -0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> > OK - but even if it is all public domain, it would be helpfule to have a
> > COPYING or LICENSE file clearly stating this (and the authors,
> > perhaps).
>
> Yes, definitely. We will add one (or both).
>
> There just seems to be some confusion as to what the licensing terms
> should actually be.
We're just waiting for OK from Martin.
Martin, are you ok with your changes to
./src/ utils/python/ ufc_utils/ build.py
being put in the public domain?
--
Anders