On 15/06/11 20:29, James Westby wrote:
> Would you like the ones that you state are "direct packager maintained"
> branches requeued as well?
Not right now - I said that for ones which were apparent had substantial
non-importer history, but which I had otherwise not examined closely.
I intend to revisit them later (but for now I've stopped working on
failures until bug 797088 is fixed, as it prevents timely feedback on
whether frobbed imports actually start working).
On 15/06/11 20:29, James Westby wrote:
> Would you like the ones that you state are "direct packager maintained"
> branches requeued as well?
Not right now - I said that for ones which were apparent had substantial
non-importer history, but which I had otherwise not examined closely.
I intend to revisit them later (but for now I've stopped working on
failures until bug 797088 is fixed, as it prevents timely feedback on
whether frobbed imports actually start working).
Max.