Contains the list of timings in about 15 successful runs and here is a summary:
+ 's
1. testrunner takes almost half the time when I used standard.medium instead of standard.small (6-9 mins -> 3 mins)
2. Imagebuilder completes from 8-9 mins -> 3 mins when 4G RAM is used
-'s
1. bsb does not conclusively gain anything by increasing either RAM nor cpu cores
2. ppa-assigner stays waiting for ever because launchad taking too long to clean the 'dirty' ppa's. I've had to force make the ppa's available to continue on this.
I am going to do an MP for imagebuilder and test runner as a first step.
Ev,
Do you have a package that runs through the system in a few minutes, and how many minutes is few minutes? :)
The least I saw is 18 minutes in my runs.
https:/ /docs.google. com/a/canonical .com/spreadshee t/ccc?key= 0AvOb-Wd_ _AD8dEhkeGRWUzB nSmZ5SWhOT0RlQ0 tyWmc&usp= drive_web# gid=0
Contains the list of timings in about 15 successful runs and here is a summary:
+ 's
1. testrunner takes almost half the time when I used standard.medium instead of standard.small (6-9 mins -> 3 mins)
2. Imagebuilder completes from 8-9 mins -> 3 mins when 4G RAM is used
-'s
1. bsb does not conclusively gain anything by increasing either RAM nor cpu cores
2. ppa-assigner stays waiting for ever because launchad taking too long to clean the 'dirty' ppa's. I've had to force make the ppa's available to continue on this.
I am going to do an MP for imagebuilder and test runner as a first step.