As far as I am aware the standard 'incremental search' behaviour is to search on each letter including the 1st & 2nd letters. For examples see:
- http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=1&hl=en
- sending a new message on facebook
- searching in a browser using Ctrl+F
- Spotlight on OSX
- Instant Search in Microsoft Vista and Windows 7
etc...
Although typing a single letter will rarely produce a useful result, the actions that are performed as a result of the letter being entered (moving selected contacts to the top left, highlighting the letter in names, updating the result count, etc...) start to give the user a 'tactile' feeling of the result set being narrowed. Different behaviours on the 1st and 3rd letters being typed would also make the experience feel very disjointed.
As far as I am aware the standard 'incremental search' behaviour is to search on each letter including the 1st & 2nd letters. For examples see:
- http:// www.google. com/webhp? complete= 1&hl=en
- sending a new message on facebook
- searching in a browser using Ctrl+F
- Spotlight on OSX
- Instant Search in Microsoft Vista and Windows 7
etc...
(for further background wikipedia provides, see http:// en.wikipedia. org/wiki/ Incremental_ search)
Although typing a single letter will rarely produce a useful result, the actions that are performed as a result of the letter being entered (moving selected contacts to the top left, highlighting the letter in names, updating the result count, etc...) start to give the user a 'tactile' feeling of the result set being narrowed. Different behaviours on the 1st and 3rd letters being typed would also make the experience feel very disjointed.