Ubuntu
network-manager package

Comment 133 for bug 1624317

Revision history for this message

In bugzilla.gnome.org/ #783569, Nicholas Stommel (nstommel) wrote on 2017-06-14:

#133

Hmmmmm...I can't seem to get a backport working, but I somehow managed to get the git-master patched with your work from https://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/log/?h=th/fix-dns-priority-for-resolved-bgo783569
up and running. And...it appears like we don't have DNS leaks! Here is the output of systemd-resolved --status:

noctua@corinth:~$ systemd-resolve --status
Global
         DNS Servers: 209.222.18.222
                      209.222.18.218
          DNSSEC NTA: 10.in-addr.arpa
                      16.172.in-addr.arpa
                      168.192.in-addr.arpa
                      17.172.in-addr.arpa
                      18.172.in-addr.arpa
                      19.172.in-addr.arpa
                      20.172.in-addr.arpa
                      21.172.in-addr.arpa
                      22.172.in-addr.arpa
                      23.172.in-addr.arpa
                      24.172.in-addr.arpa
                      25.172.in-addr.arpa
                      26.172.in-addr.arpa
                      27.172.in-addr.arpa
                      28.172.in-addr.arpa
                      29.172.in-addr.arpa
                      30.172.in-addr.arpa
                      31.172.in-addr.arpa
                      corp
                      d.f.ip6.arpa
                      home
                      internal
                      intranet
                      lan
                      local
                      private
                      test

Link 3 (tun0)
      Current Scopes: none
       LLMNR setting: yes
MulticastDNS setting: no
      DNSSEC setting: no
    DNSSEC supported: no

Link 2 (wlo1)
      Current Scopes: LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6
       LLMNR setting: yes
MulticastDNS setting: no
      DNSSEC setting: no
    DNSSEC supported: no

and here is the output from the extended test of dnsleaktest.com:

Test complete

...so it looks like this *might* be fixed upstream! Would it be possible for you to backport this fix for the Ubuntu package maintainers? I'm afraid I tried but nothing different happened, so this might be dependent on a number of previous commits or stuff not found in the current zesty package. It would be amazing to have a solution for this 'downstream', thanks for your work!