Comment 19 for bug 1710019

Revision history for this message
dann frazier (dannf) wrote : Re: [Bug 1710019] Re: support GICv3 ITS save/restore & migration

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:50 AM, ChristianEhrhardt
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Dann, I don't want to miss the activity here - so the next step you are expecting is me to evaluate the diff in detal and prep a qemu SRU?
> Along that you will do regression tests on arm and I could do x86/ppc/s390x?
>
> Is that correct then I'd create a ppa for both of us to do the checks or
> is something missing that I should wait on?

Christian,
  Personally, I've pinned my activity here until the issue in Comment
#2 is resolved upstream. Vijaya has submitted her patch upstream and
it is under discussion:

  http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg605138.html

Until that concludes, I can't be 100% sure that QEMU will require no
further patches. But once that is resolved, then I think your proposed
plan above sounds good.

   -dann