Comment 20 for bug 1636847

Revision history for this message
SaveTheRbtz (savetherbtz) wrote :

Is it possible (pun intended) to compromise on `CONFIG_SQUASHFS_DECOMP_MULTI` (which uses num_online_cpus) instead of `CONFIG_SQUASHFS_DECOMP_MULTI_PERCPU` (which uses `num_possible_cpus`)?