The patch from @faulpeltz hasn't been mainlined because of some feedback that it shouldn't have to close and reopen the /dev/vmbus/hv_vss device after failure.
I addressed this comment this in a modified version of @faulpeltz's patch (see comment #345).
I haven't heard from @faulpeltz whether he's tested it. From my testing, it seems fine and I expect to resubmit it upstream. If we can make it a SAUCE patch, that would be nice.
The patch from @faulpeltz hasn't been mainlined because of some feedback that it shouldn't have to close and reopen the /dev/vmbus/hv_vss device after failure.
I addressed this comment this in a modified version of @faulpeltz's patch (see comment #345).
I haven't heard from @faulpeltz whether he's tested it. From my testing, it seems fine and I expect to resubmit it upstream. If we can make it a SAUCE patch, that would be nice.