Ubuntu
linux package

  1. Xenial (16.04)
  2. Bug #1753662
  3. Comment #51

Comment 51 for bug 1753662

Revision history for this message
Nobuto Murata (nobuto) wrote :

171d8b9363725e122b164e6b9ef2acf2f751e387 looks good. The next test is with 4681ee21d62cfed4364e09ec50ee8e88185dd628.

4.4.0-116(xenial) - bad (9 of 31 - 29.0%)
v4.12-rc2 - bad (15 of 53 - 28.3%)
v4.12-rc3 - bad (24 of 90 - 26.6%)

====
v4.12.0-041200rc1 #201803141333 - relatively good (1 of 217 - 0.5%) 171d8b9363725e122b164e6b9ef2acf2f751e387
v4.12.0-041200rc1 #201803131457 - relatively good (1 of 93 - 1.1%) d38162e4b5c643733792f32be4ea107c831827b4
v4.12.0-041200rc3 #201803121355 - relatively good (1 of 252 - 0.4%) 25f480e89a022d382ddc5badc23b49426e89eabc
v4.12.0-041200rc3 #201803090724 - relatively good (2 of 77 - 2.6%) 400129f0a3ae989c30b37104bbc23b35c9d7a9a4
v4.12.0-041200rc3 #201803081620 - relatively good (1 of 36 - 2.8%) 0bb230399fd337cc9a838d47a0c9ec3433aa612e
v4.12.0-041200rc3 #201803080803 - good (0 of 22 - 0%) ff5a20169b98d84ad8d7f99f27c5ebbb008204d6
v4.12-rc4 - relatively good (1 of 70 - 1.4%)
v4.12 - relatively good (5 of 68 - 7.4%)
v4.13 - good (0 of 41 - 0%)
4.13.0-36(xenial HW) - good (0 of 119 - 0%)