In linux-azure, we have a set of custom changes on top of hv_pkt_iter_close(). The provided fix partially overlaps with bug #1731994. Because of that, I'm reverting #1731994 and applying the patch on top of that.
Can MS confirm if that is the right approach?
Thank you.
In linux-azure, we have a set of custom changes on top of hv_pkt_ iter_close( ). The provided fix partially overlaps with bug #1731994. Because of that, I'm reverting #1731994 and applying the patch on top of that.
Can MS confirm if that is the right approach?
Thank you.