@Manoj: can you MP a fix for vivid before we do the trusty one? Basically like the wily one, but with the following changes:
- Please drop the changes to s390x - it won't be supported in trusty, an SRUs should avoid unnecessary changes.
- Please either drop the changes on arm32 *or* verify the bug on an arm32 platform and verify the fix there.
- Please drop the arch-independent changes (i.e. cpu->setProduct(value))
- Please drop the __ID("@(#) change at the top of the file - it is an unnecessary change.
- Please make the new patch the last entry in the debian/patches/series file
- Please add a debian/changelog entry - ideally copying the one from wily, but with an LP bug reference.
Once we SRU the vivid one, we can move on to trusty with the same above changes.
@Manoj: can you MP a fix for vivid before we do the trusty one? Basically like the wily one, but with the following changes:
- Please drop the changes to s390x - it won't be supported in trusty, an SRUs should avoid unnecessary changes. (value) ) patches/ series file
- Please either drop the changes on arm32 *or* verify the bug on an arm32 platform and verify the fix there.
- Please drop the arch-independent changes (i.e. cpu->setProduct
- Please drop the __ID("@(#) change at the top of the file - it is an unnecessary change.
- Please make the new patch the last entry in the debian/
- Please add a debian/changelog entry - ideally copying the one from wily, but with an LP bug reference.
Once we SRU the vivid one, we can move on to trusty with the same above changes.