On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 05:06:57 PM you wrote:
> On 2015-04-28 00:16:15, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Monday, April 27, 2015 10:14:47 PM you wrote:
> > > Hi Jonathan (and Scott) - This update fixes a security issue so it
> > > should go through the -security sponsoring process rather than the SRU
> > > process. The Security Team will get it sponsored to the security pocket
> >
> > > once these steps are followed:
> > I know for security it's supposed to be built against security and not
> > proposed/updates, but this close to release it's essentially the same
> > thing. Can you just pocket copy this to security?
>
> We can do that in this case but it definitely isn't something that we
> should make a habit of.
>
> Just to be clear, do you want us to copy it from -proposed to -security
> now or wait until the SRU process completes and copy it from -updates to
> -security at that time?
Your call on when. It's the upstream fix, so I'm confident it's correct, but we
can get someone to do verification first if you prefer.
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 05:06:57 PM you wrote:
> On 2015-04-28 00:16:15, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Monday, April 27, 2015 10:14:47 PM you wrote:
> > > Hi Jonathan (and Scott) - This update fixes a security issue so it
> > > should go through the -security sponsoring process rather than the SRU
> > > process. The Security Team will get it sponsored to the security pocket
> >
> > > once these steps are followed:
> > I know for security it's supposed to be built against security and not
> > proposed/updates, but this close to release it's essentially the same
> > thing. Can you just pocket copy this to security?
>
> We can do that in this case but it definitely isn't something that we
> should make a habit of.
>
> Just to be clear, do you want us to copy it from -proposed to -security
> now or wait until the SRU process completes and copy it from -updates to
> -security at that time?
Your call on when. It's the upstream fix, so I'm confident it's correct, but we
can get someone to do verification first if you prefer.