Maybe I'm missing something here. What you have described is certainly a bug and should be fixed. But why is the nfs root being mounted read-only to begin with? An on-disk root is mounted read-only so that if it's dirty fsck can clean it up. But that makes no sense for an nfs root.
Maybe I'm missing something here. What you have described is certainly a bug and should be fixed. But why is the nfs root being mounted read-only to begin with? An on-disk root is mounted read-only so that if it's dirty fsck can clean it up. But that makes no sense for an nfs root.