On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 01:20:03AM -0000, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> also see bug 833891 as a udev bug specifically for the LVM case.
Do you mean you're already tracking the LVM case on that bug instead, and
that in the setup you're using there is *no* use of LVM? I guess no one
told Adam that this is a different bug, because it was his LVM-based setup
that I was responding to... :)
> In fact, Eduard toward the end speculated precisely the semaphore as a
> cause as you just did.
That was Eduard's speculation, copied from the *other* bug I linked to.
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 01:20:03AM -0000, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> also see bug 833891 as a udev bug specifically for the LVM case.
Do you mean you're already tracking the LVM case on that bug instead, and
that in the setup you're using there is *no* use of LVM? I guess no one
told Adam that this is a different bug, because it was his LVM-based setup
that I was responding to... :)
> In fact, Eduard toward the end speculated precisely the semaphore as a
> cause as you just did.
That was Eduard's speculation, copied from the *other* bug I linked to.