Comment 102 for bug 818177
Revision history for this message
| Eduard Hasenleithner (eduard-hasenleithner) wrote Re: boot failures because 'udevadm exit' times out while udevd waits for an already-dead thread | #102 |
> (I would prefer not to just '|| true' the udevadm call, though, since I
> think having to occasionally reboot the machine again is better than being
> left with extra udev processes running around doing who-knows-what on the
> system.)
Very valid point. But wouldn't it then be better in the case of udevadm-control failing to do something which gets 100% attention of the user, and with an explicit diagnosis message describing the problem? Simply not moving '/dev' to rootfs, and letting the failed boot to reach its "fate", seems to be a bit too obscure for me.
Being an "expert user", I would also like to have the busybox-shell for the failure case of course ;)