Comment 25 for bug 651370

Revision history for this message
Stefan Bader (smb) wrote :

@Brandon, sorry for the late response. Have been traveling. And yes, Scott's reply is right. The comment about 68G was made because selecting this size seems to trigger the crash more reliably. But it has nothing to do with the memory size itself. Just that requesting that size seems to get you a recent Intel box behind the covers. Just found this to happen while looking at another bug about 68G not being detected correctly in Maverick and finding that I never get the instance up due to this.