But I agree that it only explains the upstream part of it.
There might indeed be a benefit of confusing users less.
Not by removing the message, but by pointing to a better written version of my explanation above?
I thought this exists already and there I found an actual issue
Maybe add a section to to /usr/share/doc/clamav/README.Debian.gz and emit a log line after the pointer to https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Installing.html?
This discussion isn't new at all, the net is full of people asking "Oh I see Outdated" and others telling them "yeah, but it is not ..." - so considering an extra entry might be worth it?
As an example, e.g. in [1] users also asked to make it less panic'y
The remaining message one could discuss is
"^Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!"
Which will indeed be always shown except in phases were we released an update until there is yet another one upstream.
The following puts it a bit in context: /docs.clamav. net/manual/ Installing. html""
""DON'T PANIC! Read https:/
But I agree that it only explains the upstream part of it.
There might indeed be a benefit of confusing users less.
Not by removing the message, but by pointing to a better written version of my explanation above?
I thought this exists already and there I found an actual issue doc/clamav/ README. Debian. gz and emit a log line after the pointer to https:/ /docs.clamav. net/manual/ Installing. html?
Maybe add a section to to /usr/share/
This discussion isn't new at all, the net is full of people asking "Oh I see Outdated" and others telling them "yeah, but it is not ..." - so considering an extra entry might be worth it?
As an example, e.g. in [1] users also asked to make it less panic'y
[1]: https:/ /bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 986622# 59