Comment 6 for bug 2009191

Revision history for this message
Paul Gevers (paul-climbing) wrote :

Thanks. I think that was the missing piece for me. After some checking, the solution now also makes sense.

Maybe we could have fixed that `if` instead (or maybe *also*). As the comment above it said, I wasn't sure if that `if` even was useful. But let's leave it as it is now.