Alan Pope wrote:
>
> http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/
>
> Just because something is popular, doesn't make it right.
>
@alan
i'v know about brain storm...
but its for new ideas and implementation...
i suggest for voting already implemented new features...
i understand that popular doesnt mean right...
* but right or wrong doesnt have to be forced down peoples throats * ...
this new feature is not fully functional as proposed in the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NotifyOSD#Update%20Manager
without the settings available, * the user has no control over the
updates* , its just the default 1 week display for the updates other
than security updates...
the whole problem is the incomplete implementation of a good idea...
wouldnt it have been better to leave the update manager alone until u
could have made the settings available?
notify-osd as a whole is incomplete, but to break the update settings
for the notify-osd is what the users dont understand...
Alan Pope wrote: brainstorm. ubuntu. com/
>
> http://
>
> Just because something is popular, doesn't make it right.
>
@alan
i'v know about brain storm...
but its for new ideas and implementation...
i suggest for voting already implemented new features...
i understand that popular doesnt mean right...
* but right or wrong doesnt have to be forced down peoples throats * ...
this new feature is not fully functional as proposed in the /wiki.ubuntu. com/NotifyOSD# Update% 20Manager
https:/
without the settings available, * the user has no control over the
updates* , its just the default 1 week display for the updates other
than security updates...
the whole problem is the incomplete implementation of a good idea...
wouldnt it have been better to leave the update manager alone until u
could have made the settings available?
notify-osd as a whole is incomplete, but to break the update settings
for the notify-osd is what the users dont understand...