I don't think so. The date on that is January 2008, and that patch was integrated long ago.
>It seems to be something that was fixed in 2.6.29.
So you've independently confirmed that it was fixed in stock 2.6.29? If so, then I think we have two people who have confirmed that it was fixed in 2.6.29, and one person who has reported it fixed in 2.6.28-rc8. (See my previous note for potential patches that might have fixed this issue.)
@26: osdir.com/ ml/file- systems. ext4/2008- 01/msg00083. html
>Vague guess but does this bug have any relevance?
>http://
I don't think so. The date on that is January 2008, and that patch was integrated long ago.
>It seems to be something that was fixed in 2.6.29.
So you've independently confirmed that it was fixed in stock 2.6.29? If so, then I think we have two people who have confirmed that it was fixed in 2.6.29, and one person who has reported it fixed in 2.6.28-rc8. (See my previous note for potential patches that might have fixed this issue.)