On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 05:13:28PM -0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Was there any systemd/udev change in this timeframe? As the device
> files are very much connected to those.
My understanding is that these devices are supposed to be created directly
by the kernel on devtmpfs and NOT via udev, which is part of how we expected
to fix the earlier races.
And systemd did not change in this time frame in any release. If there was
a change to the HOST udev in this timeframe causing a regression because a
new base image was published that includes a newer udev, we don't have
visibility on it.
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 05:13:28PM -0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Was there any systemd/udev change in this timeframe? As the device
> files are very much connected to those.
My understanding is that these devices are supposed to be created directly
by the kernel on devtmpfs and NOT via udev, which is part of how we expected
to fix the earlier races.
And systemd did not change in this time frame in any release. If there was
a change to the HOST udev in this timeframe causing a regression because a
new base image was published that includes a newer udev, we don't have
visibility on it.