Comment 23 for bug 2028366

> I suppose it's possible that the particular dkms module that failed to build is essential for booting the
> system, so the new approach that hides this build failure could render the system unbootable without the
> user realizing it.

We still have the old kernel with the built DKMS around, so the system is not unbootable. Just the default kernel might be.

> I would like some sort of commitment on the follow-up work for the release upgrader to check the status
> of dkms builds after the upgrade. Can we get an LP bug for it please?

We can use bug 2020406 for that.