Log in / Register
Ubuntu
crash package
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Jammy (22.04)
Bug #2038249
Comment #41
Comment 41 for bug 2038249
Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
wrote
on 2024-05-03
:
#41
Wouldn't it be less risky to just backport 8.0.4 instead of 24/36 commits to mantic/jammy?
Wouldn't it be less risky to just backport 8.0.4 instead of 24/36 commits to mantic/jammy?
Wouldn't it be less risky to just backport 8.0.4 instead of 24/36 commits to mantic/jammy?