Following up on #57. IMO, filesystem corruption is one of the worst types of bugs a Linux distro can introduce. That this was bug was known, released anyways, and only mentioned 2000+ words into the patch notes is particularly egregious. I doubt a bug in EXT4 would be treated with the same carelessness. If you're shipping ZFS as a root filesystem in Ubuntu then you need to treat it as such.
Has Canonical made any statement regarding how they will prevent this from happening in the future?
Following up on #57. IMO, filesystem corruption is one of the worst types of bugs a Linux distro can introduce. That this was bug was known, released anyways, and only mentioned 2000+ words into the patch notes is particularly egregious. I doubt a bug in EXT4 would be treated with the same carelessness. If you're shipping ZFS as a root filesystem in Ubuntu then you need to treat it as such.
Has Canonical made any statement regarding how they will prevent this from happening in the future?