I am sorry not to understand as well as you do the in's and out's of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates, so can I ask you to confirm, please, that I've understood things correctly ?
My understanding #1: Hardy won't receive any new "simple" patch if it is not related to a high impact bug.
My understanding #2: Same things stand for Intrepid, Jaunty and Karmic.
My understanding #3: Ubuntu hackers (like James Westby) have already a lot of work and cannot cope with supplementary tasks like doing more fixes than authorized by the policy pointed earlier (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates)
My understanding #4: This policy uses the safety standpoint as an official argument not to allow you to maintain a high quality level for a release version like the Hardy LTS one.
My understanding #5: Distributions like Debian have already managed to fix this bug (which is not related to a high impact flaw) because they do not have that policy.
My understanding #6: LTS means Long Term Support for High Impact Problems (HIPs) only, not Other Annoying Flaws (OAFs).
My understanding #7: This bug (#86685) is not a high impact bug.
I hope I expressed myself clearly enough not to prevent you from understanding my underlying ideas.
Thank you by advance to take the time required to explain me things clearly.
Dear James Westby,
Dear Ubuntu hacker,
I am sorry not to understand as well as you do the in's and out's of https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/StableRelea seUpdates, so can I ask you to confirm, please, that I've understood things correctly ?
My understanding #1: Hardy won't receive any new "simple" patch if it is not related to a high impact bug.
My understanding #2: Same things stand for Intrepid, Jaunty and Karmic.
My understanding #3: Ubuntu hackers (like James Westby) have already a lot of work and cannot cope with supplementary tasks like doing more fixes than authorized by the policy pointed earlier (https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/StableRelea seUpdates)
My understanding #4: This policy uses the safety standpoint as an official argument not to allow you to maintain a high quality level for a release version like the Hardy LTS one.
My understanding #5: Distributions like Debian have already managed to fix this bug (which is not related to a high impact flaw) because they do not have that policy.
My understanding #6: LTS means Long Term Support for High Impact Problems (HIPs) only, not Other Annoying Flaws (OAFs).
My understanding #7: This bug (#86685) is not a high impact bug.
I hope I expressed myself clearly enough not to prevent you from understanding my underlying ideas.
Thank you by advance to take the time required to explain me things clearly.
Michel Nolard