> Leaving your users high and dry for a day before the updated
> .deb can be put out is better than not getting a chance to
> test what you release.
Nit: it really isn't what Ubuntu releases. It is what Adobe releases. AIUI, Ubuntu is just a distribution vector, and trying to make sure that what Ubuntu *does* control is compatible with what Adobe releases. Are you are viewing Flash as part of the Ubuntu release rather than as a convenience package to install a widely used third party application? Is there anything about the Ubuntu package that does anything other than ensure that dependencies are met, and install the download from Adobe?
> I agree on that point: that wasn't done so well. Given that future
> upgrades don't break users, the new releases would come out in a
> matter of hours after some testing.
In which case, I hope that we won't be having this discussion in the future. It wasn't a matter of an hour or a day.
> Leaving your users high and dry for a day before the updated
> .deb can be put out is better than not getting a chance to
> test what you release.
Nit: it really isn't what Ubuntu releases. It is what Adobe releases. AIUI, Ubuntu is just a distribution vector, and trying to make sure that what Ubuntu *does* control is compatible with what Adobe releases. Are you are viewing Flash as part of the Ubuntu release rather than as a convenience package to install a widely used third party application? Is there anything about the Ubuntu package that does anything other than ensure that dependencies are met, and install the download from Adobe?
> I agree on that point: that wasn't done so well. Given that future
> upgrades don't break users, the new releases would come out in a
> matter of hours after some testing.
In which case, I hope that we won't be having this discussion in the future. It wasn't a matter of an hour or a day.