Actually no. It builds and does not have any downsides, but does not resolve the issue. Sorry for that. When I looked at the history of cpu_map and this patch, I did not see that it would require further patches to actually make it work.
So that would leave it at these four patches:
Add-pschange-mc-no-bit-in-IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES-MSR.patch
Request-test-files-update-when-adding-x86-features.patch
Add-missing-x86-features-in-0x7-CPUID-leaf.patch
Add-missing-x86-features-in-0x80000008-CPUID-leaf.patch
Add-missing-AMD-SVM-features.patch
Plus the patch adding the EPYC-Rome model. I'll try to get it upstream, but it will take some time. From my side, it's totally fine from my side to go ahead with the update without it.
My patch queue for qemu also has 2 more patches, reported as LP#1896751 and LP#1896751
Actually no. It builds and does not have any downsides, but does not resolve the issue. Sorry for that. When I looked at the history of cpu_map and this patch, I did not see that it would require further patches to actually make it work.
So that would leave it at these four patches: mc-no-bit- in-IA32_ ARCH_CAPABILITI ES-MSR. patch test-files- update- when-adding- x86-features. patch x86-features- in-0x7- CPUID-leaf. patch x86-features- in-0x80000008- CPUID-leaf. patch AMD-SVM- features. patch
Add-pschange-
Request-
Add-missing-
Add-missing-
Add-missing-
Plus the patch adding the EPYC-Rome model. I'll try to get it upstream, but it will take some time. From my side, it's totally fine from my side to go ahead with the update without it.
My patch queue for qemu also has 2 more patches, reported as LP#1896751 and LP#1896751