The mosquitto test seems to be failing regardless of the version of
openssl, I'll take a look at puma.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 1:35 PM Gunnar Hjalmarsson <
<email address hidden>> wrote:
> @Simon: autopkgtest for mosquitto and puma fails on s390x.
>
> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
> migration/update_excuses.html#openssl
>
> Please investigate.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
> Foundations Team, which is a bug assignee.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931994
>
> Title:
> [Ubuntu 20.04] OpenSSL bugs im s390x AES code
>
> Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
> In Progress
> Status in openssl package in Ubuntu:
> Fix Committed
> Status in openssl source package in Bionic:
> New
> Status in openssl source package in Focal:
> New
> Status in openssl source package in Hirsute:
> New
> Status in openssl source package in Impish:
> Fix Committed
>
> Bug description:
> Problem description:
>
> When passing a NULL key to reset AES EVC state, the state wouldn't be
> completely reset on s390x.
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14900
>
> Solution available here:
>
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/dc67210d909b5dd7a50f60a96f36f3f5a891b1c8
>
> Should be applied to all distros where openssl 1.1.1 is included for
> consistency reason.
> -> 21.10, 20.04, 18.04.
> I think not needed for 16.04 anymore....
>
> [Test plan]
>
> $ sudo apt install libssl-dev
> $ gcc test.c -o evc-test -lcrypto -lssl # See
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1931994/comments/2
> for the test.c program
> $ ./evc-test && echo OK
>
> [Where problems could occur]
>
> This patch only touches s390x code paths, so there shouldn't be any
> regression on other architectures. However, on s390x this could reveal
> latent bugs by spreading a NULL key to new code paths.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1931994/+subscriptions
>
>
The mosquitto test seems to be failing regardless of the version of
openssl, I'll take a look at puma.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 1:35 PM Gunnar Hjalmarsson <
<email address hidden>> wrote:
> @Simon: autopkgtest for mosquitto and puma fails on s390x. /people. canonical. com/~ubuntu- archive/ proposed- update_ excuses. html#openssl /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1931994 /github. com/openssl/ openssl/ pull/14900 /github. com/openssl/ openssl/ commit/ dc67210d909b5dd 7a50f60a96f36f3 f5a891b1c8 /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ openssl/ +bug/1931994/ comments/ 2 /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu- z-systems/ +bug/1931994/ +subscriptions
>
> https:/
> migration/
>
> Please investigate.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
> Foundations Team, which is a bug assignee.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> [Ubuntu 20.04] OpenSSL bugs im s390x AES code
>
> Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
> In Progress
> Status in openssl package in Ubuntu:
> Fix Committed
> Status in openssl source package in Bionic:
> New
> Status in openssl source package in Focal:
> New
> Status in openssl source package in Hirsute:
> New
> Status in openssl source package in Impish:
> Fix Committed
>
> Bug description:
> Problem description:
>
> When passing a NULL key to reset AES EVC state, the state wouldn't be
> completely reset on s390x.
> https:/
>
> Solution available here:
>
> https:/
>
> Should be applied to all distros where openssl 1.1.1 is included for
> consistency reason.
> -> 21.10, 20.04, 18.04.
> I think not needed for 16.04 anymore....
>
> [Test plan]
>
> $ sudo apt install libssl-dev
> $ gcc test.c -o evc-test -lcrypto -lssl # See
> https:/
> for the test.c program
> $ ./evc-test && echo OK
>
> [Where problems could occur]
>
> This patch only touches s390x code paths, so there shouldn't be any
> regression on other architectures. However, on s390x this could reveal
> latent bugs by spreading a NULL key to new code paths.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>
>