Comment 4 for bug 2060740
Revision history for this message
| Aaron Rainbolt (arraybolt3) wrote Re: fsattr fails to run | #4 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
At least at first glance, I think this is SRU-able:
2.2. Other safe cases
...
Bugs which do not fit under above categories, but (1) have an obviously safe patch and (2) affect an application rather than critical infrastructure packages (like X.org or the kernel).
...
From https:/
All that's being done is adding a couple of build dependencies, the program appears to be useless without them so it can't get much worse, and this isn't critical infrastructure, so I think it can be SRU'd.