Comment 46 for bug 1832915
Revision history for this message
| Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) wrote | #46 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
73416ba
(Get the code!)
TBH, I'd not mark this as prio high from our POV.
It is high to "know if something will come back on this" but not the actual issue.
For the wider Ubuntu community this is just a rarely used universe package with a somewhat dead upstream - nothing to stress out for IMHO.
It is somewhat important to us, if it is important to IBM.
The reason it might be important is that all of this started with bugs reported against it by IBM.
The reasons could be
a) IBM uses it (or plans to) somewhere for production then it should be important to them
b) some odd testcase was run, maybe on an outdated test definition and actually nobody cares, then I guess everyone is fine to close this as won't fix.