(In reply to Luca Coelho from comment #32) > Here's the patch that was sent upstream: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20191009094853.PfIm3J8o7DN_Femup- > OXkJdtmKE7rftk1ODkm7cx-vk@z/
That patch/https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/12e36d98d3e5acf5fc57774e0a15906d55f30cb9 is not marked for stable afaics. I wonder if it should, as it contains this line: ``` Fixes: f5a47fae6aa3 ("iwlwifi: mvm: fix version check for GEO_TX_POWER_LIMIT support") ``` And that patch was recently backported to 5.3: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.3.y&id=3a0b7157d6a9833cefd40b5f0fa1cc90285bb4b5
Thus I suspect that 12e36d98d3e5 should be backported, too. I guess Bug 205163 is an indicator for that, as it talks about Linux 5.3.5.
(In reply to Luca Coelho from comment #32) /lore.kernel. org/linux- wireless/ 20191009094853. PfIm3J8o7DN_ Femup- ODkm7cx- vk@z/
> Here's the patch that was sent upstream:
> https:/
> OXkJdtmKE7rftk1
That patch/https:/ /git.kernel. org/torvalds/ c/12e36d98d3e5a cf5fc57774e0a15 906d55f30cb9 is not marked for stable afaics. I wonder if it should, as it contains this line: /git.kernel. org/pub/ scm/linux/ kernel/ git/stable/ linux.git/ commit/ ?h=linux- 5.3.y&id= 3a0b7157d6a9833 cefd40b5f0fa1cc 90285bb4b5
```
Fixes: f5a47fae6aa3 ("iwlwifi: mvm: fix version check for GEO_TX_POWER_LIMIT support")
```
And that patch was recently backported to 5.3:
https:/
Thus I suspect that 12e36d98d3e5 should be backported, too. I guess Bug 205163 is an indicator for that, as it talks about Linux 5.3.5.