Nope. Did that multiple times while debugging this issue. As described, the group mapping expectes that the first RDN is the same as the user_id_attribute, which should either be stated in the documentation or fixed by changing the group mapping code.
Nope. Did that multiple times while debugging this issue. As described, the group mapping expectes that the first RDN is the same as the user_id_attribute, which should either be stated in the documentation or fixed by changing the group mapping code.