Comment 2 for bug 1828617

Revision history for this message
David A. Desrosiers (setuid) wrote :

This manifests itself as the following, as reported by lsblk(1). Note the missing Ceph LVM volume on the 6th NVME disk:

$ cat sos_commands/block/lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda 8:0 0 1.8T 0 disk
|-sda1 8:1 0 512M 0 part /boot/efi
`-sda2 8:2 0 1.8T 0 part
  |-foobar--vg-root 253:0 0 1.8T 0 lvm /
  `-foobar--vg-swap_1 253:1 0 976M 0 lvm [SWAP]
nvme0n1 259:0 0 1.8T 0 disk
`-ceph--c576f63e--dfd4--48f7--9d60--6a7708cbccf6-osd--block--9fdd78b2--0745--47ae--b8d4--04d9803ab448 253:6 0 1.8T 0 lvm
nvme1n1 259:1 0 1.8T 0 disk
`-ceph--6eb6565f--6392--44a8--9213--833b09f7c0bc-osd--block--a7d3629c--724f--4218--9d15--593ec64781da 253:5 0 1.8T 0 lvm
nvme2n1 259:2 0 1.8T 0 disk
`-ceph--c14f9ee5--90d0--4306--9b18--99576516f76a-osd--block--bbf5bc79--edea--4e43--8414--b5140b409397 253:4 0 1.8T 0 lvm
nvme3n1 259:3 0 1.8T 0 disk
`-ceph--a821146b--7674--4bcc--b5e9--0126c4bd5e3b-osd--block--b9371499--ff99--4d3e--ab3f--62ec3cf918c4 253:3 0 1.8T 0 lvm
nvme4n1 259:4 0 1.8T 0 disk
`-ceph--2e39f75a--5d2a--49ee--beb1--5d0a2991fd6c-osd--block--a1be083e--1fa7--4397--acfa--2ff3d3491572 253:2 0 1.8T 0 lvm
nvme5n1 259:5 0 1.8T 0 disk