Comment 35 for bug 1710019

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 4:51 AM, ChristianEhrhardt
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Hi Dann,
> maybe it was good to hold off on this.
> It seems it causes a regression on arm, see bug 1734326.
> Also by holding for an arbitrary amount of time it might block the SRU queue for something else.

Sorry for the late reply - holidays, and behind on e-mail :(

> If you agree I'd ask you to let the SRU team cancel the upload from proposed.

I agree. I think it is best to scrap the zesty backport at this point.
I will request the reject.

> And you can then take time to:
> a) continue with the kernel Team discussions
> b) analyze how bug 1734326 would be related and how to fix it
>
> If you do so I'd immediately do a revert in the qemu git so that the
> next SRU doesn't push the same by accident.
>
> @Coreycb - if done that way you likely want to cancel ocata proposed as
> well.

+1 cancelling the current ocata-proposed QEMU.

I'll make a todo to investigate LP: #1734326 to see if it can be
easily resolved and, if so, possibly request that we carry these
patches as a diff in the ocata cloud archive.