Comment 36 for bug 1705748

Unfortunately there seems another issue with this kernel:
The screen/video is blank on resume, I think this is the offending part:

ug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 165.478069] nouveau 0000:27:00.0: DRM: resuming fence...
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 165.478082] nouveau 0000:27:00.0: DRM: resuming display...
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 165.501235] nouveau 0000:27:00.0: DRM: resuming console...
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 165.524428] ata6: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 165.541138] ata6.00: configured for UDMA/133
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 165.636931] usb 1-3: reset high-speed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 166.032975] usb 1-8: reset high-speed USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 168.723550] r8169 0000:25:00.0 enp37s0: link up
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.227911] PM: resume of devices complete after 4181.953 msecs
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.228289] PM: Finishing wakeup.
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.228290] OOM killer enabled.
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.228290] Restarting tasks ... done.
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.236474] usb 1-3.1: USB disconnect, device number 4
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.655196] nouveau 0000:27:00.0: DVI-D-1: EDID is invalid:
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.655198] [00] BAD 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 4c 2d 40 02 39 31 42 4d
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.655198] [00] BAD 09 12 01 03 00 26 1e 78 2a ee 95 a3 54 4c 99 26
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.655199] [00] BAD 0f 50 54 bf ef 80 81 80 81 40 71 4f 01 01 01 01
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.655199] [00] BAD 01 01 01 01 01 01 30 2a 00 98 51 00 2a 40 30 70
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.655199] [00] BAD 13 00 78 2d 11 00 00 1e 00 00 00 fd 00 38 4b 1e
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.655200] [00] BAD 51 0e 00 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 fc 00 53
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.655200] [00] BAD 79 6e 63 4d 61 73 74 65 72 0a 20 20 00 00 00 ff
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.655200] [00] BAD 00 48 56 4e 51 32 30 30 37 37 35 0a 20 20 00 40
Aug 8 14:08:50 phs08 kernel: [ 169.655202] nouveau 0000:27:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for DVI-D-1
Aug 8 14:08:51 phs08 kernel: [ 169.798065] nouveau 0000:27:00.0: HDMI-A-1: EDID is invalid:
Aug 8 14:08:51 phs08 kernel: [ 169.798066] [00] BAD 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 4c 2d 40 02 39 31 42 4d
Aug 8 14:08:51 phs08 kernel: [ 169.798067] [00] BAD 09 12 01 03 00 26 1e 78 2a ee 95 a3 54 4c 99 26
Aug 8 14:08:51 phs08 kernel: [ 169.798067] [00] BAD 0f 50 54 bf ef 80 81 80 81 40 71 4f 01 01 01 01
Aug 8 14:08:51 phs08 kernel: [ 169.798068] [00] BAD 01 01 01 01 01 01 30 2a 00 98 51 00 2a 40 30 70
Aug 8 14:08:51 phs08 kernel: [ 169.798068] [00] BAD 13 00 78 2d 11 00 00 1e 00 00 00 fd 00 38 4b 1e
Aug 8 14:08:51 phs08 kernel: [ 169.798068] [00] BAD 51 0e 00 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 fc 00 53
Aug 8 14:08:51 phs08 kernel: [ 169.798068] [00] BAD 79 6e 63 4d 61 73 74 65 72 0a 20 20 00 00 00 ff
Aug 8 14:08:51 phs08 kernel: [ 169.798069] [00] BAD 00 48 56 4e 51 32 30 30 37 33 31 0a 20 20 00 40
Aug 8 14:08:51 phs08 kernel: [ 169.798070] nouveau 0000:27:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for HDMI-A-1
Aug 8 14:08:51 phs08 kernel: [ 169.947663] nouveau 0000:27:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for DVI-D-1
Aug 8 14:08:51 phs08 kernel: [ 170.090561] nouveau 0000:27:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for HDMI-A-1
Aug 8 14:08:53 phs08 kernel: [ 172.189022] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
Aug 8 14:08:53 phs08 kernel: [ 172.189048] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
Aug 8 14:08:53 phs08 kernel: [ 172.201105] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Aug 8 14:08:53 phs08 kernel: [ 172.201118] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133

...but the install of this kernel did not go so smoothly - maybe I did something wron. Previously I downloaded the four files and just double-clicked on each file in file manager to install, but this time it complained and I first had to uninstall the previous version before trying again, with apparent success - is this the correct approach ?