Comment 14 for bug 1716409

For those wondering: I should've realized this much earlier, the importance being 'Low' is not some sort of anti-Flatpak conspiracy, it's because the bug satisfies the criteria for Low importance as per: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance

'Bugs that affect unusual end-user configurations or uncommon hardware
Bugs that affect a non-essential aspect and limited scope of the application
Non-ideal default configuration'

Though I think there's a case to make this higher importance:

'A bug that has a moderate impact on a core application' (Medium)
'Has a severe impact on a small portion of Ubuntu users (estimated)' (High)
'Renders essential features or functionality of the application or dependencies broken or ineffective' (High) - some would consider installing Flatpaks from their software center an 'essential feature', even if Flatpak and the plugin in question are in universe not main. (High)