Comment 1 for bug 477434

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote : Re: zsync doesn't work optimaly with local files (and this can be improved)

A, B and C seem to be about skipping further input files when 100% of the data has been found, and are therefore equivalent to bug 605428, which already has a patch, so they require no further consideration.

D seems to be about changing the order in which zsync searches for local data. This is less obvious, and it's not clear to me whether the proposed ordering would be better *in general* than what zsync does today. It depends on how it is typically used, and I don't have any data on that.