Comment 11 for bug 25799

Revision history for this message
In , Matthias Klose (doko-cs) wrote : Re: Bug#339409 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#339409: typo in lib64z1-dev dependency)

Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
> As far as I can tell there is no actual bug here: the lib64c-dev
> provides exists in unstable and the dependency appears to do what I was
> expecting it to do.

yes, but you are required to depend on a real package as well, not
just only on a virtual package.