------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2020-07-23 11:48 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > Hi, were the s390-tools maintainer able to dive deeper into this?
>
> Hi,
> I'm no s390-tools maintainer but I guess in the long run it's easiest when
> you rebuild the zfcpdump kernel with the new names otherwise ubuntu will be
> decoupled from upstream.
Hi,
I have to agree with Philipp and the decoupling from upstream. I'd also suggest to rebuild the zfcpdump kernel with the new name.
------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2020-07-23 11:48 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > Hi, were the s390-tools maintainer able to dive deeper into this?
>
> Hi,
> I'm no s390-tools maintainer but I guess in the long run it's easiest when
> you rebuild the zfcpdump kernel with the new names otherwise ubuntu will be
> decoupled from upstream.
Hi,
I have to agree with Philipp and the decoupling from upstream. I'd also suggest to rebuild the zfcpdump kernel with the new name.
For reference, this is the upstream change that introduced the issue: /github. com/ibm- s390-tools/ s390-tools/ commit/ 724f1fea2c52383 1a300c71fc67a87 f598701846
https:/