Chris Lord writes ("[Bug 57161] Re: Impossible to install libsmjs-dev with firefox present"):
> Sorry, I must've missed something - What is your proposed solution? That
> it be built against libnspr from firefox?
That, or build it against it own but link it against the firefox one
at runtime. (This latter might not work.)
> What might be sensible would be to build libsmjs from its own source
> tarball, as it was before, instead of xulrunner?
Chris Lord writes ("[Bug 57161] Re: Impossible to install libsmjs-dev with firefox present"):
> Sorry, I must've missed something - What is your proposed solution? That
> it be built against libnspr from firefox?
That, or build it against it own but link it against the firefox one
at runtime. (This latter might not work.)
> What might be sensible would be to build libsmjs from its own source
> tarball, as it was before, instead of xulrunner?
That's another sensible option.
Ian.