>
> > I believe that the 1.8.5 numbering scheme is a pretty bad one, and is only
> > there because of history. Perhaps we should change it; maybe to the Firefox
> > version number or the Gecko one.
>
> So combining, you're proposing libspidermonkey-4.so ?
But i would also rather we ship with what we have now than get bogged down in deciding something else if there isn't a clear consensus.
Personally the 'JS version' has always seemed fairly arbitrary, and also I don't imagine there will change very fast - so using FF or moz versions would be far superior.
> -4.so ?
> > I believe that the 1.8.5 numbering scheme is a pretty bad one, and is only
> > there because of history. Perhaps we should change it; maybe to the Firefox
> > version number or the Gecko one.
>
> So combining, you're proposing libspidermonkey
As someone else mentioned, there is also the version numbers from the moz central tree - for instance FF4 was 2.0: http:// hg.mozilla. org/releases/ mozilla- 2.0/tags
But i would also rather we ship with what we have now than get bogged down in deciding something else if there isn't a clear consensus.
Personally the 'JS version' has always seemed fairly arbitrary, and also I don't imagine there will change very fast - so using FF or moz versions would be far superior.