Comment 28 for bug 488354
Revision history for this message
|
|
#28 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
67d34a1
(Get the code!)
I wouldn't worry about supporting non-EABI in Linux. It might be nice to have a conditional #error in case someone tries it. GCC still supports non-EABI for now, at least, though I don't know of anyone using it.
A 2* improvement is fantastic! I'm guessing that's because you only make one pass of the argument list; I saw similar effects on the WinCE version with that modification (which was really simple for WinCE's calling convention).