Is this significant? Both in bug 21416 and bug 40297 the Xorg.0.log shows the following:
(II) Loading sub module "fb"
(II) LoadModule: "fb"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libfb.a
Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libfb.a:fbmmx.o": No symbols found
(II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 6.8.2, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.2
On my system, libfb.a has the following details:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 214592 2005-10-10 21:10 libfb.a
Even mc complains of "no symbols" for fbmmx.o if I take a look at libfb.a.
Is this significant? Both in bug 21416 and bug 40297 the Xorg.0.log shows the following:
(II) Loading sub module "fb" lib/modules/ libfb.a lib/modules/ libfb.a: fbmmx.o" : No symbols found
(II) LoadModule: "fb"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/
Skipping "/usr/X11R6/
(II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 6.8.2, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.2
On my system, libfb.a has the following details:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 214592 2005-10-10 21:10 libfb.a
Even mc complains of "no symbols" for fbmmx.o if I take a look at libfb.a.