(In reply to comment #210)
> (In reply to comment #206)
> > (In reply to comment #205)
> > > Seems like we are back to square 1 with most recent 2.6.35 git update.
> >
> > I'm running 2.6.35-rc6 (juli 22) + v9 patch, which works for me. There have
> > been a number of Intel DRM updates since though. I'll see if I encounter the
> > same problem with latest git and then bisect.
> >
> > PS: do any of you have problems with full screen video or OpenGL apps? My
> > system crashes immediately after starten such apps (flash, doom, warzone,
> > etc.).
>
> Bisect just completed, the bad commit is:
>
> 592d32cc4156ee512e55c5bc052fdece215f52b2 Merge
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb-2.6
>
> It modifies (strangely) the i915 driver although it's not an USB-thing. I am
> inspecting the diff right now but it seems like a blunder.
>
> I'll post my findings upstream as soon as I have finished with it
Most of the patch has already been reverted, except the change reverted by the following small patch (which I am now testing):
(In reply to comment #210) 12e55c5bc052fde ce215f52b2 Merge kernel. org/pub/ scm/linux/ kernel/ git/gregkh/ usb-2.6
> (In reply to comment #206)
> > (In reply to comment #205)
> > > Seems like we are back to square 1 with most recent 2.6.35 git update.
> >
> > I'm running 2.6.35-rc6 (juli 22) + v9 patch, which works for me. There have
> > been a number of Intel DRM updates since though. I'll see if I encounter the
> > same problem with latest git and then bisect.
> >
> > PS: do any of you have problems with full screen video or OpenGL apps? My
> > system crashes immediately after starten such apps (flash, doom, warzone,
> > etc.).
>
> Bisect just completed, the bad commit is:
>
> 592d32cc4156ee5
> git://git.
>
> It modifies (strangely) the i915 driver although it's not an USB-thing. I am
> inspecting the diff right now but it seems like a blunder.
>
> I'll post my findings upstream as soon as I have finished with it
Most of the patch has already been reverted, except the change reverted by the following small patch (which I am now testing):
diff --git a/drivers/ gpu/drm/ i915/intel_ dp.c b/drivers/ gpu/drm/ i915/intel_ dp.c gpu/drm/ i915/intel_ dp.c gpu/drm/ i915/intel_ dp.c dpms(struct drm_encoder *encoder, int mode)
intel_ dp_link_ train(intel_ encoder, dp_priv->DP, dp_priv- >link_configura tion);
if (IS_eDP( intel_encoder) ) {
ironlake_ edp_panel_ on(dev) ; edp_backlight_ on(dev) ;
}
index 5dde80f..8608462 100644
--- a/drivers/
+++ b/drivers/
@@ -806,7 +806,6 @@ intel_dp_
- ironlake_
}
}
This is possibly the only (related) difference.