(In reply to comment #41)
> (In reply to comment #40)
> > Well, I've visited this link and see some spherical thingy made of
> > particles. What should I check?
>
> Just look at top; For this particular benchmark, it should be ratelimited by
> the Xorg process not firefox - or better look at sudo perf top, if firefox
> is hitting pixman functions, it is a bad firefox.
When running this demo in firefox `# perf top` says "42% libpixman-1.so.0.29.2" and this line sits on top of the list. Does that mean bad firefox? :(
(In reply to comment #41)
> (In reply to comment #40)
> > Well, I've visited this link and see some spherical thingy made of
> > particles. What should I check?
>
> Just look at top; For this particular benchmark, it should be ratelimited by
> the Xorg process not firefox - or better look at sudo perf top, if firefox
> is hitting pixman functions, it is a bad firefox.
When running this demo in firefox `# perf top` says "42% libpixman- 1.so.0. 29.2" and this line sits on top of the list. Does that mean bad firefox? :(