Comment 39 for bug 1098334

Revision history for this message
In , Joe Peterson (bx09m7e-say-zwnfzpm) wrote :

(In reply to comment #30)
> I think the effect is now subtle enough that I'm not going to worry too much
> - it is undoubtably a missing flush or incorrect hw state. Since I can
> reproduce using the chromium tabs, I'll fix it one day (hopefully!). Please
> do ping occasionally to remind me, or if you have a found a particular nasty
> example.

Hey Chris, do you think this could be mainly a HW bug only on the older graphics chips? In other words, is the code obeying the spec, but it would take an odd (non-spec) workaround to make the HW behave?

If you have put in any extra flushes to try to fix this, perhaps those should now be removed so as not to affect performance adversely, especially if the extra ones affect newer HW as well (or did you only do it in the code for the old HW?).

I suspect I'll be upgrading from this old laptop soon for other reasons, so I agree that worrying too much about a hard-to-fix problem that only affects really old HW is probably not worth it (people could just turn off SNA on older HW, as long as UXA is supported for the foreseeable future).