On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:57:40PM -0000, Jeremy Visser wrote:
> Thanks for that, Bryce. Indeed, adding a "Virtual 2304 1024" line to
> xorg.conf allows me to run my monitors alongside each other at full
> resolution.
>
> However, I would agree with you that having to set Virtual at all is a
> bug. However, I couldn't find any bugs that seem to mention it.
>
> >From what I gather from your comment, the GNOME Screen Resolution tool
> can set the Virtual property on-the-fly. The reason I didn't discover
> that is because I run the stock GNOME 2.22 control panel, which is not
> xrandr 1.2-aware -- not the Ubuntu-provided one, which is aware of
> multi-monitor setups. Is it possible to do set Virtual with xrandr or
> radeontool on-the-fly? I couldn't find a way to do it.
Guess you're on your own in that case. Maybe talk to the GNOME guys.
You can always just add it manually to xorg.conf.
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:57:40PM -0000, Jeremy Visser wrote:
> Thanks for that, Bryce. Indeed, adding a "Virtual 2304 1024" line to
> xorg.conf allows me to run my monitors alongside each other at full
> resolution.
>
> However, I would agree with you that having to set Virtual at all is a
> bug. However, I couldn't find any bugs that seem to mention it.
>
> >From what I gather from your comment, the GNOME Screen Resolution tool
> can set the Virtual property on-the-fly. The reason I didn't discover
> that is because I run the stock GNOME 2.22 control panel, which is not
> xrandr 1.2-aware -- not the Ubuntu-provided one, which is aware of
> multi-monitor setups. Is it possible to do set Virtual with xrandr or
> radeontool on-the-fly? I couldn't find a way to do it.
Guess you're on your own in that case. Maybe talk to the GNOME guys.
You can always just add it manually to xorg.conf.
Bryce