On 2/3/08, bartman <email address hidden> wrote: > I should add that I got scolded on the X.org mailing list for producing > a patch that is not x-platform. I had no idea that the x86emu was > required on non-x86 platforms. So, I am extending the patch to return > 486dx2 CPUID values on non-x86 platforms. More in this thread... > > http://wiki.hungrycats.org/mediawiki/index.php/Bartman%27s_Question#and_the_result_is > > A LUG-buddy offered to resurrect his old 486 to get me the right values. > > http://wiki.hungrycats.org/mediawiki/index.php/Bartman%27s_Question#and_the_result_is
The build log for my PPA shows that the server fails to build on the AMD64 platform when the CPUID patch is applied:
https://launchpad.net/~q-funk/+archive/+builds?build_text=&build_state=failed
It successfully built on LPIA and i386, though.
-- Martin-Éric Racine http://q-funk.iki.fi
On 2/3/08, bartman <email address hidden> wrote: wiki.hungrycats .org/mediawiki/ index.php/ Bartman% 27s_Question# and_the_ result_ is wiki.hungrycats .org/mediawiki/ index.php/ Bartman% 27s_Question# and_the_ result_ is
> I should add that I got scolded on the X.org mailing list for producing
> a patch that is not x-platform. I had no idea that the x86emu was
> required on non-x86 platforms. So, I am extending the patch to return
> 486dx2 CPUID values on non-x86 platforms. More in this thread...
>
> http://
>
> A LUG-buddy offered to resurrect his old 486 to get me the right values.
>
> http://
The build log for my PPA shows that the server fails to build on the
AMD64 platform when the CPUID patch is applied:
https:/ /launchpad. net/~q- funk/+archive/ +builds? build_text= &build_ state=failed
It successfully built on LPIA and i386, though.
-- q-funk. iki.fi
Martin-Éric Racine
http://